Industry·3 min read
By BitsMindsSource: TechCrunch

ChatGPT Slips Below 50% Market Share for the First Time as Gemini and Claude Close In

Sensor Tower data reported June 16 puts ChatGPT at 46.4% of the mobile AI-assistant market by late May — below half for the first time, down from about 81% two years ago — as Gemini climbs to 27.7% and Claude to 10.3%. Claude now also out-earns ChatGPT on revenue per user.

AI ASSISTANTS · MOBILE MARKET SHARE JUN 16 ChatGPT slips below 50% — a first. Sensor Tower: 46.4% ChatGPT, 27.7% Gemini, 10.3% Claude by late May. 46.4% CHATGPT ChatGPT 46.4% Gemini 27.7% Claude 10.3% DOWN FROM 81% TWO YEARS AGO · 1.1B / 662M / 245M MONTHLY USERS BITSMINDS.COM Source: Sensor Tower · TechCrunch
Share:

For the first time since it kicked off the generative-AI boom, ChatGPT no longer commands a majority of the consumer AI market. New data from analytics firm Sensor Tower, reported on June 16, puts OpenAI's app at 46.4% of mobile AI-assistant market share by late May — below 50% for the first time — with Google's Gemini climbing to 27.7% and Anthropic's Claude reaching 10.3%. Two years ago, ChatGPT sat at roughly 81%.

The shift is one of share, not absolute decline: ChatGPT remains by far the most-used AI assistant on the planet, with more than 1.1 billion monthly users against Gemini's 662 million and Claude's 245 million. But its rivals are growing faster, and the gap is narrowing from both directions — Google leaning on Android's distribution and Anthropic winning over higher-value users.

That last point shows up starkly in the money. Sensor Tower found that Claude now earns more revenue per user than ChatGPT, with average US mobile revenue per user of about $2.76 in May — roughly 1.5 times ChatGPT's $1.74. It is a data point that reinforces a pattern BitsMinds has tracked elsewhere, as Anthropic recently overtook OpenAI in US business adoption: OpenAI owns reach, but Anthropic is monetizing intensity.

Sensor Tower also tied part of ChatGPT's slide to a specific event — OpenAI's defense deal earlier in the year, which it said triggered a measurable spike in app uninstalls. Combined with the steady rise of capable alternatives, including a wave of Chinese open-weight models eating into developer traffic, the result is a market that is finally pluralizing after years of one-app dominance.

None of this means ChatGPT is in trouble — a 46.4% share of a market this large is still a commanding lead. But the symbolism of falling below half matters, especially as OpenAI courts public investors. A market where no single assistant owns a majority is a more competitive, and more price-sensitive, one than the company enjoyed a year ago.

More on ChatGPT

Evergreen coverage we keep current — start here.

Want AI news before everyone else?

The morning's most important AI stories, straight to your inbox. No fluff.

Related Articles

Project Lily: the human on the other side of the chat In a dark office lit by a warm desk lamp, a cream-coloured ChatGPT conversation unfurls from a deep green computer screen into a paper transcript. A human reviewer in a teal shirt leans over the page, one arm dropping out of view below the near edge of the desk. Black redaction bars conceal parts of the conversation, while other lines remain visible. A seven-point rating card with a check above six sits on the desk. This imagined editorial scene represents the human review and incomplete filtering described in the article; it is not an actual review interface or a claim that every conversation is reviewed. Illustration for BitsMinds, OpenAI Project Lily human ChatGPT prompt review. Original vector artwork, 15 September 2026. PROJECT LILY ChatGPT HUMAN FEEDBACK 1234567 BITSMINDS THE HUMAN IN THE LOOP
Industry

ChatGPT Chats Are Read and Rated by Human Contractors

Beijing and Washington reject the AI slowdown An editorial still life on a midnight-blue desk. Two substantial rubber stamps flank an industry proposal to pace AI development. One stamp has a Chinese flag and a Beijing nameplate; the other has an American flag and a Washington nameplate. A large red Rejected imprint crosses the proposal. The two stamps represent separate rejections for different reasons, not an alliance. These are conceptual props, not actual government documents. THE AI SLOWDOWN Both said no. INDUSTRY PROPOSAL We must pace the frontier. REJECTED BEIJING WASHINGTON Different reasons. Same answer. BITSMINDS.COM
Industry

Beijing and Trump Both Reject the AI Slowdown

AMODEI · ALTMAN · MUSK — 12 SEPTEMBER They all agreed to slow down BITSMINDS.COM
Industry

Amodei Calls to Slow AI — Altman and Musk Agree